ABSTRACT
RESUMEN Introducción: La microfiltración coronal causada por los materiales de restauración temporal es considerada una de las causas del fracaso de los tratamientos endodónticos. A raíz de ello, en los últimos años se ha buscado crear un material de restauración temporal que sea capaz de evitar este problema. Objetivo: Comparar in vitro la microfiltración coronal de un cemento experimental y cuatro materiales de restauración temporal usados en endodoncia. Métodos: Se realizaron cavidades clase I en 90 premolares, divididos en 10 grupos (n= 9) y evaluados en dos periodos de tiempo (1 y 2 semanas). Se realizó la elaboración del cemento experimental, posteriormente se llevó a cabo el sellado coronal de las piezas dentales con el cemento experimental, Clip F (VOCO), Eugenato (MOYCO), Ketac™ Molar Easymix 3M (ESPE) y Coltosol® F. Los especímenes fueron sumergidos en tinta china (Pelikan) durante 1 y 2 semanas. Se evaluó la microfiltración en la interfase pared dentinaria-restauración temporal utilizando un esteromicroscopio (Leica Microsystems LAS EZ versión 2.0.0). La medición se realizó en milímetros en el programa LAS EZ versión 2.0.0. Resultados: Se encontró diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,05) al comparar la microfiltración coronal de los cinco materiales de restauración temporal, según el tiempo de exposición en tinta (1 y 2 semanas). Conclusiones: El cemento experimental presentó menor microfiltración que el Coltosol® F y Ketac™ Molar EasyMix 3M (ESPE); sin embargo, ninguno de los cuatro materiales fue capaz de prevenir la microfiltración en su totalidad(AU)
ABSTRACT Introduction: Coronal microleakage caused by temporary restorative materials is viewed as one of the reasons for endodontic failure. Efforts have been made in recent years to create a temporary restorative material capable of preventing that problem. Objective: Compare in vitro coronal microleakage of an "experimental cement" and four temporary restorative materials used in endodontics. Methods: Class I cavities were made in 90 premolar teeth divided into 10 groups (n= 9) and evaluated at two time periods (1 and 2 weeks). The "experimental cement" was prepared and then coronal sealing of the teeth was performed with the experimental Cement, F (VOCO), Eugenato (MOYCO), Ketac™ Molar Easymix 3M (ESPE) and Coltosol® F. The pieces were submerged in India ink (Pelikan)for 1 and 2 weeks. Microleakage was evaluated on the interface dentin wall / temporary restoration using a stereo microscope (Leica Microsystems LAS EZ version 2.0.0). Measurement was made in millimeters using the software LAS EZ version 2.0.0. Results: Statistically significant differences were found (p < 0.05) when comparing coronal microleakage in the five temporary restorative materials according to exposure time in ink (1 and 2 weeks). Conclusions: The experimental cement had less microleakage than Coltosol® F and Ketac™ Molar EasyMix 3M (ESPE). However, none of the four materials was capable of completely preventing microleakage(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Leakage/etiology , Endodontics/methods , Dental CementumABSTRACT
Abstracts: Background: To compare the microhardness and solubility of temporary restorative materials after thermocycling. Objective is to evaluate and compare the solubility of temporary restorative materials after storage in water and to evaluate and compare micro hardness of temporary restorative materials after thermocycling. Methodology: Forty specimens will be prepared for the study. Specimens are prepared according to following four groups.(n=10). Group I – Cavit, Group II - MD Temp, Group III-Coltosol, Group IV – TMP- RS. All the temporary restorative material are manipulated according to manufacturer’s instructions in the stainless steel moulds. All the samples are measured by weight. They are stored in distilled water for 7 days and again they are measured by weight after 7 days. The change in weight is evaluated. All the samples are thermocycled at 4 & 56 degree celsius with a dwell time of 60 seconds for 100 times. After thermocycling micro hardness is calculated by Vickers hardness test of all samples. Results: The study gives highly significant result with p value less than 0.001 of both solubility and micro hardness difference as detailed below. The least solubility is with Cavit G with value 0.011 followed by Coltosol F (0.039), TMP-RS(0.054) and MD Temp(0.122). The least change in micro hardness is with Cavit-G(13.48) followed by Coltosol F(15.54), MD Temp(18.07) and TMP-RS(20.41). All values are compared using one way ANOVA (p<0.001 highly significant). Conclusion: Within the limitations of study, Cavit-G has least solubility after storage in water and highest microhardness after thermocycling among four different temporary restorative materials.
ABSTRACT
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a infiltração microbiana em dentes restaurados provisoriamente com omaterial restaurador intermediário (IRM, Intermediate Restorative Material), Cavit ou Vitremer. Para tanto,foram utilizados 50 dentes humanos extraídos unirradiculares, distribuídos aleatoriamente em três gruposexperimentais e dois grupos controle (positivo e negativo). Para o modelo de estudo, empregou-se uma plataforma,dividida em duas partes: câmara superior - onde foi introduzida a suspensão microbiana contendoos indicadores biológicos (E. faecalis + S. aureus + P. aeruginosa + B. subtilis + C. Albicans); e, câmarainferior, com o meio de cultura (Brain Heart Infusion), onde os dentes permaneceram imersos com 5 mm doremanescente apical radicular (correspondente ao terço cervical) durante o período de 60 dias. Observou-sea partir dos resultados, que nos dentes dos grupos 1 (IRM) e 2 (Cavit) ocorreu infiltração microbiana a partirde 7 dias. No grupo 3 (Vitremer) não foi verificada infiltração microbiana no período de 7 a 60 dias.
This study aimed to determine the microbial coronal leakage of temporary restorative materials when employingIRM, Cavit or Vitremer, by means of differents microbial indicators. Thus, 50 single-rooted humanteeth were used, which were shaped until the file size 50 and assigned to 3 experimental groups. Two groupswas used as control. In the study model, a platform was employed, which was split in two halves: an upperchamber - where the microbial suspension containing the biological indicators was introduced (E. faecalis +S. aureus + P. aeruginosa + B. subtilis + C. albicans); and a lower chamber containing the culture mediumBrain Heart Infusion, in which 5 mm of the apical region of teeth (coronal third) were kept immersed. Interpretationsof the time to occur microbial leakage were made daily for 60 days, using the turbidity of the culturemedium which is indicative of microbial contamination, as a reference. The results showed that in the teethfrom groups 1 (IRM) and 2 (Cavit) occurred microbial leakage after 7 days. In the group 3 (Vitremer) it wasnot observed microbial leakage at intervals of 7 to 60 days.